How your body compensates for an imbalance: the path of muscle chains
Two complementary tests to understand movement
Neurocom quantifies postural control, i.e. how the brain manages balance, reacts to destabilization and distributes body weight over the legs. It evaluates timing (speed of reaction), load transfer and balance strategy — via the central nervous system, sensory integration (the way the brain combines information from vision, inner ear and body sensations) and coordination — without directly measuring muscle strength.
The Myotest quantifies the mechanical output of the neuromuscular system, i.e. the power actually produced by the muscles: jump height, strength, power, ground contact time and inter-member asymmetry indices (the difference in performance between the left and right sides of the body), via a force-speed profile (F-v). This profile is based on three values: F0 (the maximum theoretical force that the muscle could develop at zero speed), V0 (the maximum theoretical speed that the muscle could achieve without load) and Pmax (the maximum developed power, which combines force and speed).
These measurements of the Myotest are particularly reliable: the flight time jump height has an ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient, which measures the reproducibility of a measurement) of 0.92 to 0.96, or 96%, and the squat and developed lying force/power shows an R2 (coefficient indicating the quality of the relationship between two measurements) of close to 0.98, or 98%. Only the Myotest-V, which measures instant speed, remains less reliable.
| Dimension | Neurocom | Myotest |
|---|---|---|
| What is measured | Postural oscillation, reaction time, directional control, load transfer, lift/impact index | Jump height, force, power, contact time, inter-member asymmetry index |
| Nature of information | Engine control strategy and timing | Mechanical capacity and symmetry of force production |
| Own limit | Does not measure muscle strength or EMG (electromyography, measurement of electrical activity of muscles) | Do not provide information on sensory strategy or central timing |
Why a muscle chain rather than an isolated muscle?
The human body is organized into several large muscle chains (or myofascial lines, according to the concept of Anatomy Trains). — mapping of muscle chains linked by the fascia), each linking areas that seem remote but actually work together.
The Surface Floor Line (rear chain)
In cross-reading: a high lumbar load in the sitting-standing position (less than 3 = low) associated with a reduced jump power and an elongated contact time is compatible with a lower eccentric reactive posterior chain (i.e. less capable of braking a movement) — and not just one « lumbar weakness » isolated. On the functional level, this results in a deterioration of the return of elastic energy to fast walking, running and jumping reception, with a compensatory overload of the lumbar spine during repeated sitting-standing transfers.
The Previous Surface Line (front chain)
On the Neurocom side: dorsifolation/franchise (the clearance of the forefoot) and standing seat (tibial advance). Myotest side: the concentric force of the quadriceps (the force developed in the phase of active contraction) in squat jump and pulse index. A low standing lift index (less than 40%) combined with a reduced squat jump force/power on the same side suggests a shared limitation of the anterior chain in concentric, rather than an isolated deficit of the anterior tibial or quadriceps. The main risk is a difficulty in initiating hip/kneel flexion and foot clearance in the oscillating phase of the walk, with a risk of hanging on the ground, the body compensating by postponing the load to the posterior controlateral chain.
The Lateral Line (string to the side)
On the Neurocom side: lateral directional control (LOS, for Limits of Stability, the limits of stability), unipodal support and symmetry of supports. Myotest side: inter-member power asymmetry. A support asymmetry Neurocom greater than 13% combined with a consistent Myotest side-to-side index reinforces the hypothesis of a less efficient lateral chain — Peron, medium buttock, oblique — with a possible role of the homolateral cervical complex (on the same side). Functionally, this results in a change of direction instability, a frontal control of ankle and a degraded knee (with a risk of dynamic valgus, i.e. the knee moving inward), and a lower transmission of force during unipodal tasks and stroke with a change of support.
The Spiral Line (diagonal chain)
Neurocom side: rotational crossing, oblique directional control and center of gravity alignment. Myotest side: asymmetrical power when moving with rotary component and left/right differential contact time. A directional control asymmetry combined with a difference in diagonal inter-member power is compatible with an inefficiency of the cross spiral line — a clinical hypothesis to be explored before conclusion. The main alteration affects the mechanisms of trunk rotation and dissociation between the scapular belt (the shoulders) and the pelvic belt (the pelvic belt), which are particularly sought after in running, in steering changes and in asymmetric sports.
Deep Front Line and cervical-ocular axis (deep chain)
A loss of dynamic vision greater than 40% during a rapid cervical rotation, associated with an asymmetry of power of the lower limbs to the Myotest, oriented towards a CMOC (oculo-cervical muscle coordination, i.e. coordination between the movements of the eyes and the neck) insufficient to stabilize the eye during explosive exertion. This can affect the accuracy of the sport gesture and the risk of falling into a dynamic task.
Summary grid
| Suspected Mechanism | Signal Neurocom | Myotest signal | Fascial line |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insufficient eccentric braking | Elongated contact time, lumbar load raised in sitting-standing | Reduced jump power, extended ground contact time | Surface floor |
| Propulsion/concentric limited | Low lifting index, difficult forefoot clearance | Low concentric force/power in squat jump | Previous superficial |
| Frontal instability | Asymmetric unipodal oscillation, weak lateral directional control | Powerful inter-member asymmetry | Lateral |
| Deficiency of rotational dissociation | Oblique / altered diagonal directional control | Cross asymmetry of power | Spiral |
| Stabilisation of the eyes in effort | Loss of dynamic visual acuity in cervical rotation | Dynamic task performance asymmetry | Deep Front Line / cervical-ocular axis |
How can these imbalances be addressed?
| Fascial line | Manual therapy | Examples of movement |
|---|---|---|
| Surface floor | Release of plantar fascia, sural triceps (the calf), ischio-lambs and thoraco-lumb fascia; heel slip technique to the occiput (back of skull) | Slow eccentric work of the sural triceps (unipodal elevations controlled in descent), buttock bridge with maintenance time, « hip hinge » (hips), jumps with controlled reception |
| Previous superficial | Release of the fascia of the anterior leg compartment, quadriceps and abdomen right; tibio-talian mobilization in dorsiflexion (mobilization of the ankle) | Concentric reinforcement of the anterior tibial (resistant dorsiflexion), progressive squat jump, walking on the heels |
| Lateral | Release of the ilio-tibial tractus, peroners and lateral obliques; Frontal mobilization of the subtalum (the joint under the ankle) | Unipodal stabilization with frontal disturbance, not chased resisted, strengthening of the middle buttocks and eccentric ferns |
| Spiral | Cross release techniques (controlateral-hanche shoulder); rotational thoracic mobilisation | Wood chop, rotary slots, scapular/pelvic belt dissociation exercises |
| Deep Front Line / Cervicoocular | Release of scalenes, suboccipitals and sternocleidomastoids; mild cranial and cervical techniques | Eye stabilization exercises (VOR/gaze stability, i.e. eye stabilization during head movement) combined with visual target jumps |
A reading that remains a hypothesis to be confirmed
The interpretation process follows four steps: measure (with both tests), cross-check the results, confirm by clinical examination, and then target the intervention. Some signals must alert and impose a medical orientation before any manual intervention or movement: unexplained major motor asymmetry, progressive weakness that worsens over time, or any neurological sign.
By systematically crossing Neurocom and Myotest, and anchoring the assumptions in clinical examination, it becomes possible to design precise, progressive and objectivable interventions — for sports performance and injury prevention.
__________________________
Our health and sports experts help you build the right habits, lasting. Make an appointment to discuss it.
@Lonhea – Patented Method


